Dieters take note: Eating earlier in the day may help you shed pounds.
Indeed researchers from Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the University of Murcia in Spain found that it’s not only what you eat but when you eat that matters when it comes to losing weight.
The observational study, published in the International Journal of Obesity, found that among a group of overweight or obese Spanish diners, those who ate a late lunch (after 3 p.m) showed slower weight-loss rates and lost significantly less weight than folks who ate lunch earlier (before 3 pm). Notably, there was no significant difference in overall calories consumed by either group or their estimated energy expenditures, said senior author Frank Scheer, PhD, MSc, director of the Medical Chronobiology Program and assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School. Rather, “the timing of meals predicted weight loss effectiveness,” he said.
(As is often the case in Mediterranean countries, lunch is the main meal of the day; for these study participants, it made up about 40 percent of total caloric intake for a 24-hour period.)
Scheer said the study corroborates earlier animal studies in which meal timing determined weight gain in mice.
So, what’s going on here?
Scheer said one hypothesis is that when you eat meals at “abnormal” times there may be a disruption of the normal synchrony of metabolic clocks in various organs. “The disruption of these metabolic clocks may underlie why we see such differences between the groups,” he said.
Another possibility involves glucose uptake: “The speed at which glucose is taken up from the blood stream to the body tissue is different at different times of the day,” Scheer said, “in the morning glucose is taken faster to the body tissue compared to later in the day.”
Here are some more details from the news release:
To evaluate the role of food timing in weight-loss effectiveness, the researchers studied 420 overweight study participants who followed a 20-week weight-loss treatment program in Spain. The participants were divided into two groups: early-eaters and late-eaters, according to the self-selected timing of the main meal, which in this Mediterranean population was lunch. During this meal, 40 percent of the total daily calories are consumed. Early-eaters ate lunch anytime before 3 p.m. and late-eaters, after 3 p.m. They found that late-eaters lost significantly less weight than early-eaters, and displayed a much slower rate of weight-loss.
Researchers found that timing of the other (smaller) meals did not play a role in the success of weight loss. However, the late eaters—who lost less weight—also consumed fewer calories during breakfast and were more likely to skip breakfast altogether. Late-eaters also had a lower estimated insulin sensitivity, a risk factor for diabetes.
The researchers also examined other traditional factors that play a role in weight loss such as total calorie intake and expenditure, appetite hormones leptin and ghrelin, and sleep duration. Among these factors, researchers found no differences between both groups, suggesting that the timing of the meal was an important and independent factor in weight loss success.
“This study emphasizes that the timing of food intake itself may play a significant role in weight regulation” explains Marta Garaulet, PhD, professor of Physiology at the University of Murcia Spain, and lead author of the study. “Novel therapeutic strategies should incorporate not only the caloric intake and macronutrient distribution, as it is classically done, but also the timing of food.”
About the author
Blogger, CommonHealth Rachel Zimmerman worked as a staff reporter for The Wall Street Journal for 10 years, most recently covering health and medicine out of the paper’s Boston bureau. Rachel has also written for The New York Times, the (now-defunct) Seattle Post-Intelligencer and the alternative newspaper Willamette Week, in Portland, Ore., among other publications. Rachel co-wrote a book about birth, published by Bantam/Random House, and spent 2008 as a Knight Science Journalism Fellow at MIT. Rachel lives in Cambridge with her husband and two daughters. View all posts by Rachel Zimmerman →
Even at the lofty institution that bears the nickname Man’s Greatest Hospital, most medical residents think they’re not taught well enough about addiction and substance abuse, a 2012 survey found. The hospital itself, Massachusetts General Hospital, sent over word of … Read More
- Abercrombie: 'No Uncool.' Now Victoria's Secret: No Mastectomy Bras
- Mass. Blocks Higher Insurance Charges For Most Smokers
The New York Times‘ coverage of the ‘How much salt is too much salt?’ debate got a thrashing in a Huffington Post column yesterday by the head of a nonprofit health and nutrition advocacy group. In the column, Michael F. … Read More
- Film: Posted Calorie Counts Understate Truth
- One Harvard Researcher's Surreal 'Dr. Oz Show' Experience
A new study from the Harvard School of Public Health finds that women who were abused when they were young appear to be more likely to have children with autism. The study, just out online in the journal JAMA Psychiatry, … Read More
- Should Massachusetts Tax Candy And Soda?
- Is 'Google Flu Trends' Prescient Or Wrong?
In our house, when there’s good news and bad news, we usually start with the good. So here goes: According to a new national health statistics report out today analyzing five key health behaviors among U.S. adults — sufficient sleep, … Read More
- It's The Carbs: ADHD In Childhood Linked To Adult Obesity, Study Finds
- After Losing 322 Pounds, One Man's Thoughts On Christie Surgery