<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Uninsured Will Decide What is Affordable&#8221; by Bill Walczack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commonhealth.wbur.org/bill-walczak/2007/04/the-uninsured-will-decide-what-is-affordable-by-bill-walczack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/bill-walczak/2007/04/the-uninsured-will-decide-what-is-affordable-by-bill-walczack/</link>
	<description>CommonHealth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:13:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HelloWorld</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/bill-walczak/2007/04/the-uninsured-will-decide-what-is-affordable-by-bill-walczack/comment-page-1/#comment-1970</link>
		<dc:creator>HelloWorld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/weblogs/commonhealth/?p=59#comment-1970</guid>
		<description>Peace people 
 
We love you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peace people </p>
<p>We love you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/bill-walczak/2007/04/the-uninsured-will-decide-what-is-affordable-by-bill-walczack/comment-page-1/#comment-1807</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 04:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/weblogs/commonhealth/?p=59#comment-1807</guid>
		<description>i think, at least initially, that community rating would make the program too hard of a sell for the young and healthy, who, as you point out, are the least likely to buy into the system. If a healthy 30 year old does not see the point of $250/mo insurance they will surely balk at $500/mo. That being said, the high prices quoted for older people are a glaring weakness in the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think, at least initially, that community rating would make the program too hard of a sell for the young and healthy, who, as you point out, are the least likely to buy into the system. If a healthy 30 year old does not see the point of $250/mo insurance they will surely balk at $500/mo. That being said, the high prices quoted for older people are a glaring weakness in the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter S.</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/bill-walczak/2007/04/the-uninsured-will-decide-what-is-affordable-by-bill-walczack/comment-page-1/#comment-1779</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 11:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/weblogs/commonhealth/?p=59#comment-1779</guid>
		<description>Bill,  Great blog entry and terrific questions.  I am so glad you&#039;re raising the issue of community rating:  bringing it back, inside and outside the Connector--would help make coverage more  affordable to many and restore one of the basic principles of insurance:  spread risk broadly.  It&#039;s hard to use community rating in a voluntary insurance system but now that we&#039;ve decided, for better or worse, to go the mandatory route, the business and policy arguments against community rating are not so salient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,  Great blog entry and terrific questions.  I am so glad you&#8217;re raising the issue of community rating:  bringing it back, inside and outside the Connector&#8211;would help make coverage more  affordable to many and restore one of the basic principles of insurance:  spread risk broadly.  It&#8217;s hard to use community rating in a voluntary insurance system but now that we&#8217;ve decided, for better or worse, to go the mandatory route, the business and policy arguments against community rating are not so salient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
