<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Will Changes to the Employer Fair Share Contribution be Preempted by Federal Law?&#8221; Amy B. Monahan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commonhealth.wbur.org/guest-contributors/2008/09/will-changes-to-the-employer-fair-share-contribution-be-preempted-by-federal-law-amy-b-monahan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/guest-contributors/2008/09/will-changes-to-the-employer-fair-share-contribution-be-preempted-by-federal-law-amy-b-monahan/</link>
	<description>CommonHealth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:36:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CommonHealth</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/guest-contributors/2008/09/will-changes-to-the-employer-fair-share-contribution-be-preempted-by-federal-law-amy-b-monahan/comment-page-1/#comment-7806</link>
		<dc:creator>CommonHealth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonhealth.wbur.org/?p=702#comment-7806</guid>
		<description>WBUR asked Ms. Monahan to add her thoughts about whether a threshold the state plans to set for health plan benefits might violate ERISA.  Here&#039;s her response:

The minimum creditable coverage standards shouldn&#039;t implicate ERISA (and therefore risk being preempted) because they merely establish the requirements for individuals to satisfy the individual mandate.

Because it&#039;s a requirement that only individuals must meet, the connection to an employee benefit plan would be considered too remote to be held preempted by ERISA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WBUR asked Ms. Monahan to add her thoughts about whether a threshold the state plans to set for health plan benefits might violate ERISA.  Here&#8217;s her response:</p>
<p>The minimum creditable coverage standards shouldn&#8217;t implicate ERISA (and therefore risk being preempted) because they merely establish the requirements for individuals to satisfy the individual mandate.</p>
<p>Because it&#8217;s a requirement that only individuals must meet, the connection to an employee benefit plan would be considered too remote to be held preempted by ERISA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
