<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Employee Free Choice Act: Protecting American Workers&#8217; Rights So Our Economy Works For Everyone&#8221; by Mike Fadel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commonhealth.wbur.org/guest-contributors/2009/03/the-employee-free-choice-act-protecting-american-workers-rights-so-our-economy-works-for-everyone-by-mike-fadel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/guest-contributors/2009/03/the-employee-free-choice-act-protecting-american-workers-rights-so-our-economy-works-for-everyone-by-mike-fadel/</link>
	<description>CommonHealth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:52:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Levy</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/guest-contributors/2009/03/the-employee-free-choice-act-protecting-american-workers-rights-so-our-economy-works-for-everyone-by-mike-fadel/comment-page-1/#comment-8446</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonhealth.wbur.org/?p=1109#comment-8446</guid>
		<description>&quot;Forming a union should be no more difficult than joining a church or a political party.&quot;  It is not at all the same thing.  When you join a church or a political party, you do so for yourself.

In contrast, when a union is formed, it represents all workers in the bargaining unit and becomes their exclusive representative with the company -- hence the term &quot;collective bargaining&quot;.  A union does not include just the ones who wanted to create it or join it.

It is important, therefore, to provide a guarantee for a secret ballot vote on the question. That is really the only way to demonstrate respect for different opinions and to allow a decision by the majority in a forum that is not subject to intimidation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Forming a union should be no more difficult than joining a church or a political party.&#8221;  It is not at all the same thing.  When you join a church or a political party, you do so for yourself.</p>
<p>In contrast, when a union is formed, it represents all workers in the bargaining unit and becomes their exclusive representative with the company &#8212; hence the term &#8220;collective bargaining&#8221;.  A union does not include just the ones who wanted to create it or join it.</p>
<p>It is important, therefore, to provide a guarantee for a secret ballot vote on the question. That is really the only way to demonstrate respect for different opinions and to allow a decision by the majority in a forum that is not subject to intimidation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Levy</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/guest-contributors/2009/03/the-employee-free-choice-act-protecting-american-workers-rights-so-our-economy-works-for-everyone-by-mike-fadel/comment-page-1/#comment-8445</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonhealth.wbur.org/?p=1109#comment-8445</guid>
		<description>&quot;For instance in the hospital industry, one of our largest and wealthiest employers, over 19,337 workers and their dependents had to rely on public health insurance last year.&quot;  As I recall, these figures include both unionized and non-unionized hospitals and may not be a good indication of the value of this piece of legislation.  Similar numbers exist, as I recall, too, for state and local government agencies, many of which are already unionized.  I&#039;m not saying that the numbers are wrong, but rather that they are not necessarily an argument for this bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For instance in the hospital industry, one of our largest and wealthiest employers, over 19,337 workers and their dependents had to rely on public health insurance last year.&#8221;  As I recall, these figures include both unionized and non-unionized hospitals and may not be a good indication of the value of this piece of legislation.  Similar numbers exist, as I recall, too, for state and local government agencies, many of which are already unionized.  I&#8217;m not saying that the numbers are wrong, but rather that they are not necessarily an argument for this bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Turnbull</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/guest-contributors/2009/03/the-employee-free-choice-act-protecting-american-workers-rights-so-our-economy-works-for-everyone-by-mike-fadel/comment-page-1/#comment-8439</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Turnbull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonhealth.wbur.org/?p=1109#comment-8439</guid>
		<description>If you want to read some other perspectives on why EFCA might be good public policy in a global economy, check out:

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=why_we_need_efca

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=where_are_the_workers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to read some other perspectives on why EFCA might be good public policy in a global economy, check out:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=why_we_need_efca" rel="nofollow">http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=why_we_need_efca</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=where_are_the_workers" rel="nofollow">http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=where_are_the_workers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biff Goodwin</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/guest-contributors/2009/03/the-employee-free-choice-act-protecting-american-workers-rights-so-our-economy-works-for-everyone-by-mike-fadel/comment-page-1/#comment-8431</link>
		<dc:creator>Biff Goodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonhealth.wbur.org/?p=1109#comment-8431</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for labor. I&#039;m all for reworking the National Labor Relations Act to address the things you mention -- timely elections, penalties for punitive action by employers, etc. But I&#039;m firmly against taking away the secret ballot and therefore I&#039;m against the so-called &quot;Free Choice&quot; act. Your union, and others that have undertaken caustic attacks on the people and institutions that oppose your creepy, un-Democratic bill, should be ashamed. You&#039;re actually hurting your own cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for labor. I&#8217;m all for reworking the National Labor Relations Act to address the things you mention &#8212; timely elections, penalties for punitive action by employers, etc. But I&#8217;m firmly against taking away the secret ballot and therefore I&#8217;m against the so-called &#8220;Free Choice&#8221; act. Your union, and others that have undertaken caustic attacks on the people and institutions that oppose your creepy, un-Democratic bill, should be ashamed. You&#8217;re actually hurting your own cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RThompson</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/guest-contributors/2009/03/the-employee-free-choice-act-protecting-american-workers-rights-so-our-economy-works-for-everyone-by-mike-fadel/comment-page-1/#comment-8430</link>
		<dc:creator>RThompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonhealth.wbur.org/?p=1109#comment-8430</guid>
		<description>First: your comment about public health insurance --isn&#039;t part of the union&#039;s platform a push for a single-payer system?  So, why so disparaging about workers currently on that system?  Second: as a family member of several union members -- one who had no choice but to join -- it is clear that union membership is not a panacea. Mass. has a very high rate of union membership...why so against an election? Finally: if it can&#039;t win in a fair election, the union plays unfair -- look at what they&#039;ve been doing to BIDMC.  Give workers a choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First: your comment about public health insurance &#8211;isn&#8217;t part of the union&#8217;s platform a push for a single-payer system?  So, why so disparaging about workers currently on that system?  Second: as a family member of several union members &#8212; one who had no choice but to join &#8212; it is clear that union membership is not a panacea. Mass. has a very high rate of union membership&#8230;why so against an election? Finally: if it can&#8217;t win in a fair election, the union plays unfair &#8212; look at what they&#8217;ve been doing to BIDMC.  Give workers a choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
