<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Good Intentions: A Pediatrician&#8217;s Perspective&#8221; by Sally Ginsburg, MD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commonhealth.wbur.org/guest-contributors/2009/04/good-intentions-a-pediatricians-perspective-by-sally-ginsburg-md/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/guest-contributors/2009/04/good-intentions-a-pediatricians-perspective-by-sally-ginsburg-md/</link>
	<description>CommonHealth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Worsening Primary Care Shortage in Massachusetts &#124; Lenox Internal Medicine</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/guest-contributors/2009/04/good-intentions-a-pediatricians-perspective-by-sally-ginsburg-md/comment-page-1/#comment-9666</link>
		<dc:creator>Worsening Primary Care Shortage in Massachusetts &#124; Lenox Internal Medicine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonhealth.wbur.org/?p=1115#comment-9666</guid>
		<description>[...] every year, with the flood of paperwork coming from the insurance companies, the advent of &#8220;tiering&#8220;, and primary care reimbursement dropping every year while specialty incomes rise.&#160; Most [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] every year, with the flood of paperwork coming from the insurance companies, the advent of &#8220;tiering&#8220;, and primary care reimbursement dropping every year while specialty incomes rise.&nbsp; Most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dianne</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/guest-contributors/2009/04/good-intentions-a-pediatricians-perspective-by-sally-ginsburg-md/comment-page-1/#comment-8509</link>
		<dc:creator>dianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonhealth.wbur.org/?p=1115#comment-8509</guid>
		<description>Thanks for saying this, Elliot. I have been waiting impatiently for doctors in MA to rise up against this tiering business AND capitation. 

The big talking point on the Beltway is &quot;cutting health care costs.&quot; I hope people who hear this realize it has nothing to do with them - it really means increasing profits for the insurance companies.

The heist that is being planned by Baucus and Co. in the name of health care reform is quite the scam, as is the MA plan which was the marketing tool for the national proposal - both have little to do with access to affordable, quality, equitable, guaranteed, comprehensive health care.

Unfortunately, those in the Patrick administration and others connected to the Connector et al continue to confuse coverage with access. It doesn&#039;t matter how many have insurance - what matters is the number of residents who can afford to use the insurance (or purchase the premium or pay the penalty) or find a doctor who will see them if they are enrolled in Commonwealth Care - the no-doctor-much-less-choice-of-doctor insurance plans. This product doesn&#039;t deliver.

If you want to read the BCBS gift-wrapping job with a bow on top re capitation, check out the feature story - Sharing the Rewards - in the February issue of Healthcare Ledger. http://healthcareledger.com Ya gotta love the title!

The last paragraph is the kicker - lots in there that shows who capitation benefits and who is ultimately going to be the guiding light. Pity the docs and their patients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for saying this, Elliot. I have been waiting impatiently for doctors in MA to rise up against this tiering business AND capitation. </p>
<p>The big talking point on the Beltway is &#8220;cutting health care costs.&#8221; I hope people who hear this realize it has nothing to do with them &#8211; it really means increasing profits for the insurance companies.</p>
<p>The heist that is being planned by Baucus and Co. in the name of health care reform is quite the scam, as is the MA plan which was the marketing tool for the national proposal &#8211; both have little to do with access to affordable, quality, equitable, guaranteed, comprehensive health care.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, those in the Patrick administration and others connected to the Connector et al continue to confuse coverage with access. It doesn&#8217;t matter how many have insurance &#8211; what matters is the number of residents who can afford to use the insurance (or purchase the premium or pay the penalty) or find a doctor who will see them if they are enrolled in Commonwealth Care &#8211; the no-doctor-much-less-choice-of-doctor insurance plans. This product doesn&#8217;t deliver.</p>
<p>If you want to read the BCBS gift-wrapping job with a bow on top re capitation, check out the feature story &#8211; Sharing the Rewards &#8211; in the February issue of Healthcare Ledger. <a href="http://healthcareledger.com" rel="nofollow">http://healthcareledger.com</a> Ya gotta love the title!</p>
<p>The last paragraph is the kicker &#8211; lots in there that shows who capitation benefits and who is ultimately going to be the guiding light. Pity the docs and their patients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/guest-contributors/2009/04/good-intentions-a-pediatricians-perspective-by-sally-ginsburg-md/comment-page-1/#comment-8454</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonhealth.wbur.org/?p=1115#comment-8454</guid>
		<description>This is an incredibly well thought out argument. I am glad the Massachusetts Medical Society is suing the GIC over this grossly misleading &quot;tiering&quot; system. I can only hope the outcome of this lawsuit is a positive one for doctors everywhere in Massachusetts and that it sets a precedent for the rest of the country to follow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an incredibly well thought out argument. I am glad the Massachusetts Medical Society is suing the GIC over this grossly misleading &#8220;tiering&#8221; system. I can only hope the outcome of this lawsuit is a positive one for doctors everywhere in Massachusetts and that it sets a precedent for the rest of the country to follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
