wbur.org
support wbur today!

Yesterday was an important day for health care reform in Massachusetts. On the first birthday of our historic health reform law, the Board of the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector Authority (which I am privileged to Chair) unanimously approved a draft proposal to implement one of the centerpieces of our efforts to expand health insurance coverage: the “individual mandate” requiring all adults who can afford health insurance to have it. If you view health care reform as having three legs – employer responsibility, government responsibility, and individual responsibility – our vote was about putting that third leg in place. In doing so, the Board has set the stage for covering virtually everyone in the Commonwealth with health insurance that meets the highest standard in the nation.

Specifically, the Board adopted affordability standards that require virtually all adults in Massachusetts to have health insurance coverage, and took important steps to help them meet this new requirement. For example, in combination with requiring uninsured people who are eligible for subsidized health insurance through the Connector’s Commonwealth Care program to sign up, we lowered some of the program’s premiums to make them more affordable. As a result of these changes, there will soon be no premiums required for those who have incomes up to 150 percent of the federal poverty level (this was formerly the case only for those with incomes below 100 percent of the poverty level). We also voted to reduce premiums from $40 to $35 per month for those with incomes between 150 and 200 percent of the poverty level.

To complement these decisions, Governor Patrick decided to waive the premium payments for children in the State Children’s Health Insurance Program when they have parents paying premiums for Commonwealth Care coverage. This decision reflects the Governor’s deep commitment to improving access to quality, affordable health care and his continuing efforts to help health care reform achieve its immense promise. It will make health care more affordable for thousands of families, saving a family with three or more children as much as $84 per month in premiums. Secretary of Health and Human Services Judy Bigby played a critical role in advocating for this change and making it happen at this crucial time.

The affordability schedule adopted by the Connector also provides guidance to those at all income levels whose employers contribute to their insurance, as well as people who have incomes greater than three times the poverty level but don’t have employer-sponsored insurance. The schedule is ambitious, bringing into the ranks of the insured significant numbers of younger adults (among others). By purchasing health insurance, these individuals will secure better health care and financial protection in the event they get sick – the core purposes of this entire effort to expand coverage. Moreover, when they get covered, health insurance becomes more affordable for everyone else.

Our affordability schedule is also fair and humane. It recognizes that, at least initially, those at the very lowest income levels will largely not be able to afford health insurance unless they have access to significant subsidies, and that even at higher income levels, older people may have trouble paying for health insurance at current prices. It also recognizes that a schedule can only go so far in anticipating and addressing the reality of peoples’ lives and challenges. Thus, an individual waiver process will help provide protection to those facing particular circumstances that leave them facing financial hardship. We will also work to encourage employers to adopt Section 125 plans – which treat payments for health insurance as pre-tax income and, thus, can very significantly lower the actual costs of premiums for workers.

Wrestling with the issue of “affordability” and how to implement health care reform’s “individual mandate” is like walking a tightrope. On the one side, leaving too many people outside the individual mandate would leave too many people without health insurance – defeating the whole purpose of health care reform and, most importantly, hurting those very people by consigning them to sporadic care and no financial protection in the event a serious health issue came up. It would also frustrate the hope of making health care insurance more affordable for all through greater participation by younger, healthy people. On the other side, reaching too far in penalizing people for not having health insurance would ignore the fact that, for some, the cost of health insurance today does remain outside financial reach.

The approach adopted by the Board was an attempt to walk that tightrope successfully, and I am hopeful that we have succeeded. I believe this approach fulfills the core mission of health care reform to dramatically expand health insurance coverage, while at the same building in protections and flexibility throughout the process to avoid creating financial hardship for individuals who truly cannot afford health insurance. It makes targeted, appropriate investments in making health care more affordable without imposing substantial new costs on the state. It is our intent and hope that this process will be possible to administer, and with public outreach and education, capable of being understood. Of course, these are only draft proposals right now. They will be the subject of public hearings in May, and I know that the Connector Board and staff are very much looking forward to receiving input from consumers, businesses and others who will be affected by the decisions we make.

With success here, we will be at the gates of truly universal coverage and well-poised to get there. Bringing young people into the ranks of the insured; encouraging a “culture of insurance”; learning from the practical experience of actually implementing an “individual mandate” and offering new subsidized programs; and pursuing other initiatives to control health care costs both inside and outside the four corners of health care reform – all of these things will allow us to take the final step to ensuring coverage for absolutely everyone. No doubt, we face many challenges ahead, in continuing an ongoing process of translating the law and the Connector Board’s decisions into concrete actions that affect the lives of people throughout the Commonwealth. But I believe that we have taken a major step forward in creating a framework for ultimate success.

This latest milestone for health care reform is a product of collaboration and compromise. The approach adopted by the Board draws from the best thinking of numerous individuals and groups that are so deeply committed to the success of health care reform that they have spent countless hours working on this issue and helping relative newcomers like me get my bearings. In particular, Jon Kingsdale and his tremendous staff at the Connector continue to be both smart thinkers and good listeners. They have worked tirelessly to develop an effective and humane approach to implementing the “individual mandate,” all the while working feverishly to get people signed up for Commonwealth Care and get the Commonwealth Choice program up and running. My colleagues on the Board shaped this proposal by asking the right questions and contributing creative solutions to difficult challenges. Stakeholders, experts and advocates from diverse perspectives vigorously advanced their own proposals, but were also willing to consider other ideas and were open to compromise. Governor Patrick was not only instrumental at other stages of health care reform (such as during the bidding process for Commonwealth Choice plans) but also steered the Administration’s approach to this critical issue of affordability. And I know that we are all grateful for the continuing guidance and support of members of the Legislature, especially Speaker DiMasi and Senate President Murray.

The fact that the Board’s vote was unanimous and enjoyed support throughout the wide community that cares about health care reform is important well beyond yesterday. With everyone on board, we will be able to go out as a team and do the hard work needed to put health care reform fully into action – to educate people about both new requirements and new opportunities for affordable insurance; to help workers and employers understand the benefits of Section 125 plans; to observe the impacts of the new law; and to work together to overcome the inevitable challenges and obstacles to success.

So, happy birthday health care reform. It’s been a great year. Wishing you many more. And feeling optimistic that you’ll have them.

Leslie Kirwan is Secretary of Administration and Finance for Governor Deval Patrick and chairs the Connector Board

Share:

This entry is filed under Leslie Kirwan. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


Comments
  • Roxanne Reddington-Wilde posted:
    Comment posted April 13th, 2007 at 9:57 am

    Leslie Kirwan’s comment that Massachusetts is “walking a tightrope” when it comes to health reform is only all to accurate. Quality coverage and affordability seem to be at either end of this tightrope and linking them together a fragile act.
    We are all crossing our fingers that the compromises put into place yesterday and this past year to bring the state to both quality and affordable health insurance for all will actually work. This blog is excellent but too few uninsured in the Commonwealth are aware that December 31st is the deadline for them to sign up or pay the penalty. For the general public, health reform is as sleeper an issue as Medicare Part D was. And, as a human services provider, I remember the chaos we faced as its prescription drug plans first hit.

    Action for Boston Community Development (ABCD), where I work, is hosting a policy discussion next Wednesday on health reform for community members, providers and others. Many of the people active in this blog will be on its panel.

    “Are We There Yet? Moving to quality, universal and affordable health insurance in Massachusetts”

    Wednesday, April 18th
    4:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m.
    Cass Room, ABCD
    178 Tremont St.
    Downtown Boston (opposite Boyleston Green Line T-stop)

    Speakers include:
    *Richard Lord, Associated Industries of Massachusetts and member of the Connector Board
    *Frances Ma, South Cove Community Health Center
    *Ann Malone, UMass Boston College of Nursing & Alliance to Defend Health Care
    *Brian Rosman, Health Care for All

    To RSVP or for more information, please contact me by e-mail at redwilde@bostonabcd.org

  • Ann posted:
    Comment posted April 13th, 2007 at 10:54 am

    This law is far-reaching, yes, but even so it’s mere tinkering. Taxpayers, premium payers, employers, all of us need and deserve MUCH MORE and much better reform than what this law does. As a long-time citizen and health professional in this state I am disgraced that we have introduced the misguided concept of an “individual commercial insurance mandate” on not only on everyone in our state but the entire nation. Helping the poor is the good part of this law but other components of it will be harmful to people’s health and economic well being. We must change it before this happens.

    Voters and honest policy makers readily acknowledge that the insurance industry is more a part of the problem than a part of the effective solution. The Chapter 58 reform law is built on forcing people to buy private insurance products.

    Here’s the reason why: Elected legislators, including those in “leadership” positions, have stated publicly when meeting with groups of citizens that “No bill gets through the legislature without the approval of the insurance companies. It’s been that way for a long long time and it’s still the reality”.

    Many of us on the front lines of health care– providers, our patients, and their families–wonder why the public was not informed about this “mandate to buy insurance” proposal for state healthcare reform before it was made into law. Even though it feels much too late in the process we are looking forward to participating in the required public hearings on this new law. Please share details on these meetings as widely as possible. Thank you.

    I urge readers to look at this excellent health reform article “Enough Tinkering” at http://bookclub.tpmcafe.com/blog/bookclub/2007/apr/10/enough_tinkering

  • Mrs. Malone posted:
    Comment posted April 14th, 2007 at 12:10 am

    The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights has completed an important analysis of the Massachusetts health reform plan.

    “Mass. Promise of “Universal” Health Care Forgotten –Needed Care Would Be Unaffordable Under Insurance Mandate; State Analysis Finds Insurance Too Costly for Families, Older Consumers”

    This important national News release is available on the internet at http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/healthcare/pr/?postId=7701&pageTitle=Mass.+Promise+of+%22Universal%22+Health+Care+Forgotten+–+Needed+Care+Would+Be+Unaffordable+Under+Insurance+Mandate%3B

  • Commonhealth » Blog Archive » HEALTH REFORM’S SECOND BIRTHDAY by Leslie Kirwan posted:
    Comment posted April 11th, 2008 at 11:40 pm

    [...] I actually blogged a year ago, immediately following the first birthday of health care reform. And that blog likewise began, “Yesterday was an important day for health care reform in Massachusetts.” I was [...]

  • oreo posted:
    Comment posted March 21st, 2009 at 8:58 am

    Who do you think that you are kidding? We just got our annual increase of 9.3 percent. The year before percentage increase I have forgotten. But the previous year is was a tad over 30 percent.

    We are self employed and self insured. We now pay 1750 per month for a plan that has co-pays, deductibles, and no dental. This is for a family of three.

    I looked at the comm connector plans and they range from 1050 to 2800 per month. I question – to whom is that “affordable”?

    On the conn health plan there is no assistance if one makes over 53k per year. In this state that is not much at all.

    After paying for med insurance ourselves for the past 20 years here are my ideas:
    1 – ALL state and ALL municipal plans be offered to all self employed people *and for the same price*. We are told that govt workers are our employees and we should be offered to purchase the exact same plan at the same price.
    2 – All med insurance premiums should be fully deductible like big businesses get. If the self employed small businesses were to get organized they could certainly strike and hurt this state financially.
    3 – all rates be the same for EVERYONE. No more different prices for companies and govt. Everyone should be paying the same instead of this cost fixing which just places the largest increases on the self employed / self insured group. And as they get priced out they go on the uninsured plan and increase the rates for everyone (with the largest increase going to the self employed group).
    4 – all businesses dump their med insurance plans. Hand the employees the money and let them go on the private market and purchase it. Let’s have some open competition instead of personal depts within companies getting lower rates.

    I have yet to see ANY newspaper publish the rates the state pays or local towns pay. Its cute how the state offers towns to go onto their plan. Yet they do NOT offer it to the small businesses.

  • Leave a comment



Advertisement