<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Effects of Defensive Medicine on Health Care and What We Can Do about It&#8221; by Alan C. Woodward, MD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commonhealth.wbur.org/massachusetts-medical-society/2008/11/the-effects-of-defensive-medicine-on-health-care-and-what-we-can-do-about-it-by-alan-c-woodward-md/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/massachusetts-medical-society/2008/11/the-effects-of-defensive-medicine-on-health-care-and-what-we-can-do-about-it-by-alan-c-woodward-md/</link>
	<description>CommonHealth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:14:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn Zioto</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/massachusetts-medical-society/2008/11/the-effects-of-defensive-medicine-on-health-care-and-what-we-can-do-about-it-by-alan-c-woodward-md/comment-page-1/#comment-7935</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Zioto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonhealth.wbur.org/?p=945#comment-7935</guid>
		<description>Reform in this area of health care is absolutely essential. As stated above, defensive medicine is costing billions of dollars and, in many cases, causing unnecessary harm to both patients and health care providers. Unfortunately, American culture must undergo great change in order to acknowledge this.  Most immediately, it may be beneficial to look to systemic improvements that could aid in the minimization of human error. Computerized medical records could help to achieve this as would standardization of resources and their locations in health care settings. Force functions could also help immensely by inhibiting certain mechanically mediated errors such as incorrect medicine administration or dosage. 

Addressing systemic error will only bring us so far before we must achieve a cultural reform in which both medical professionals and the public accept the fact that human error is inevitable. By reducing the blame, shame, and personal responsibility associated with error, the medical community can encourage dialogue and strategic initiatives among health care professionals to minimize its occurrence. If the American people see these efforts, perhaps, they will begin to treat health care professionals with more compassion when error unavoidably takes place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reform in this area of health care is absolutely essential. As stated above, defensive medicine is costing billions of dollars and, in many cases, causing unnecessary harm to both patients and health care providers. Unfortunately, American culture must undergo great change in order to acknowledge this.  Most immediately, it may be beneficial to look to systemic improvements that could aid in the minimization of human error. Computerized medical records could help to achieve this as would standardization of resources and their locations in health care settings. Force functions could also help immensely by inhibiting certain mechanically mediated errors such as incorrect medicine administration or dosage. </p>
<p>Addressing systemic error will only bring us so far before we must achieve a cultural reform in which both medical professionals and the public accept the fact that human error is inevitable. By reducing the blame, shame, and personal responsibility associated with error, the medical community can encourage dialogue and strategic initiatives among health care professionals to minimize its occurrence. If the American people see these efforts, perhaps, they will begin to treat health care professionals with more compassion when error unavoidably takes place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine Loui</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/massachusetts-medical-society/2008/11/the-effects-of-defensive-medicine-on-health-care-and-what-we-can-do-about-it-by-alan-c-woodward-md/comment-page-1/#comment-7912</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine Loui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonhealth.wbur.org/?p=945#comment-7912</guid>
		<description>Thank you Dr. Woodward for your discussion of defensive medicine.  I agree that defensive medicine practices represent a substantial portion of our our-of-control healthcare costs and that we must work to reform this system that engenders a culture of fear.  As a first year medical student, I admit that our current system fraught with high malpractice premiums and stories of physicians faced with litigation is something I fear, particularly as I face the decision of which field of medicine to enter.  I have always wanted to work in women&#039;s health, but have seen many OB/GYNs quit the OB part of their practice due to high malpractice costs.  

I think it is important however, to recognize that the motivation behind our legal system may be in the right place as it seeks to hold physicians accountable for their practices to ultimately provide safe, high-quality healthcare to patients.  If we are to reform the legal system, we must begin to investigate and implement alterative mechanisms for achieving this end.  Your mention of the One Model proposed by The Joint Commission sounds especially promising, particularly for its emphasis on open communication, full disclosure and transparency.  I would like to add that we must also work towards an ideological shift that begins with acceptance from both the medical community and the public at large, that physicians are only human and as much as we seek to minimize mistakes, they are to some degree inevitable.  Only through the honest humility to recognize and admit our fallibility as physicians can we move forward towards the next step of preventing future medical error in the provision of safe, high-quality healthcare to our patients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Dr. Woodward for your discussion of defensive medicine.  I agree that defensive medicine practices represent a substantial portion of our our-of-control healthcare costs and that we must work to reform this system that engenders a culture of fear.  As a first year medical student, I admit that our current system fraught with high malpractice premiums and stories of physicians faced with litigation is something I fear, particularly as I face the decision of which field of medicine to enter.  I have always wanted to work in women&#8217;s health, but have seen many OB/GYNs quit the OB part of their practice due to high malpractice costs.  </p>
<p>I think it is important however, to recognize that the motivation behind our legal system may be in the right place as it seeks to hold physicians accountable for their practices to ultimately provide safe, high-quality healthcare to patients.  If we are to reform the legal system, we must begin to investigate and implement alterative mechanisms for achieving this end.  Your mention of the One Model proposed by The Joint Commission sounds especially promising, particularly for its emphasis on open communication, full disclosure and transparency.  I would like to add that we must also work towards an ideological shift that begins with acceptance from both the medical community and the public at large, that physicians are only human and as much as we seek to minimize mistakes, they are to some degree inevitable.  Only through the honest humility to recognize and admit our fallibility as physicians can we move forward towards the next step of preventing future medical error in the provision of safe, high-quality healthcare to our patients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
