<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NEW STUDY ON EMPLOYER PARTICIPATION IN HEALTH REFORM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commonhealth.wbur.org/michael-widmer/2007/12/new-study-on-employer-participation-in-health-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/michael-widmer/2007/12/new-study-on-employer-participation-in-health-reform/</link>
	<description>CommonHealth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:13:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Rosman</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/michael-widmer/2007/12/new-study-on-employer-participation-in-health-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-5437</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Rosman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/weblogs/commonhealth/?p=302#comment-5437</guid>
		<description>We respect Mike and the Taxpayers Foundation, which plays a constructive role in the health debates.

However, we want to quibble a bit with the statement that the fair share contribution was never intended to help pay for reform in a significant way.

The original expectation of the legislature (see this &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.hcfama.org/?p=168&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;April 06 blog entry&lt;/a&gt; for the numbers) was for the fair share assessment to raise $45 million last year, and $36 million this year. So far, only $5 million has come in over the two years. The $81 million expected was far from paying for the whole thing, but not insignificant. The shortfall in employer funding (the legislature also expected $90 million over 2 years in Free Rider payments; the current expectation is zero) is one contributor to the overall funding challenges for reform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We respect Mike and the Taxpayers Foundation, which plays a constructive role in the health debates.</p>
<p>However, we want to quibble a bit with the statement that the fair share contribution was never intended to help pay for reform in a significant way.</p>
<p>The original expectation of the legislature (see this <a href="http://blog.hcfama.org/?p=168" rel="nofollow">April 06 blog entry</a> for the numbers) was for the fair share assessment to raise $45 million last year, and $36 million this year. So far, only $5 million has come in over the two years. The $81 million expected was far from paying for the whole thing, but not insignificant. The shortfall in employer funding (the legislature also expected $90 million over 2 years in Free Rider payments; the current expectation is zero) is one contributor to the overall funding challenges for reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
