For the past couple of days, I’ve been tagging along at my husband’s annual work retreat, a gathering on the Cape of big thinkers from MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab.
This year, health is on the agenda.
Among those pushing for more research related to health care is John Guttag, a professor in the department of electrical engineering and computer science whose current work focuses on applying advanced computational techniques to medicine. (We featured his recent studies on computational biomarkers that predict heart-attack deaths here.) Guttag told me he believes computer scientists (including those at MIT) have a “moral obligation” to undertake far more research in the areas of health and medicine, indeed, they should lead the way with work that has real-world applications.
In his talk yesterday (which I didn’t attend, but Guttag kindly recounted) he essentially issued a challenge to his colleagues:
Over the next decades, computer science can contribute more to improved healthcare than any other discipline…It is simply unacceptable to be a leading academic computer science research lab without being a leader in research at the intersection of healthcare and computer science.
He added that there’s a lingering perception among computer scientists that their highly technical research shares little common ground with the all-too-real world of health care. “There is often a tension between application pull and technology push,” Guttag said in a followup email. “Academic computer scientists have an easy time applauding new computing techniques, but often struggle at deciding whether novel applications of computing constitute legitimate C.S. research.”