There’s got to be a better solution.
That’s my takeaway after viewing “Trapped,” a chilling series of photographs by Jenn Ackerman (posted on Slate) that documents the daily injustices of some extremely troubled mentally ill prisoners at the Kentucky State Reformatory.
The pictures underscore the institution’s crass attempts to keep the inmates safe and also protect the corrections officers who manage them. Some examples:
–One inmate is cuffed to his cell and made to wear a “spit mask” used “to prevent him from spitting at the doctors and correctional officers.”
–Another prisoner “stares out of the cell he remains in for 23 hours a day.”
– A correctional officer wearing rubber gloves “comforts an inmate during one of his psychotic episodes” by sticking her fingers through a little slot into his cell. Continue reading
Granted, it’s hard to get inside the head of California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to glean his thought process. But really, how could anyone possibly veto a bill to stop the deeply troubling practice of shackling pregnant female inmates in labor and during childbirth?
A California bill prohibiting the shackling of female inmates during childbirth is vetoed by the governor
This post on Our Bodies, Our Blog
, lays out the details of the veto, but it’s just mind-blowing that this practice continues legally in some U.S. states — particularly because the California bill, AB1900, was approved unanimously by the state Senate and Assembly. The law would have required the state Corrections Standards Authority to develop standards on the shackling of pregnant women, and prohibited pregnant inmates from being shackled by the wrists or ankles during transport, labor and delivery, and recovery, unless deemed necessary for safety.
Karen Shain, policy director for the California group, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children, wrote in an opinion piece in SFGate: “This veto is particularly mean spirited and only serves to support the stereotype that incarcerated women are dangerous and must be subdued at all times. During these horrendous budget times, when there is a steadily shrinking safety net, AB1900 was an inexpensive solution to a human rights problem.”