<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ARE EMPLOYERS DOING THEIR FAIR SHARE?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commonhealth.wbur.org/wbur-posts-and-stories/2007/11/are-employers-doing-their-fair-share/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/wbur-posts-and-stories/2007/11/are-employers-doing-their-fair-share/</link>
	<description>CommonHealth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:13:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Norma</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/wbur-posts-and-stories/2007/11/are-employers-doing-their-fair-share/comment-page-1/#comment-5180</link>
		<dc:creator>Norma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/weblogs/commonhealth/?p=275#comment-5180</guid>
		<description>Why should business be responsible for health care?You want to go after businessess and individuals for not paying for these awful health plans.Well why not go after the greedy insurance companies?The fact is their the ones making it impossible to afford the plans.The fact is a person should not have to depend on employers for health insurance.With this mean mandate there won&#039;t be anyone left in the State of Massachusetts.The lawmakers need to make laws against them ripping us off.Thats what needs to be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should business be responsible for health care?You want to go after businessess and individuals for not paying for these awful health plans.Well why not go after the greedy insurance companies?The fact is their the ones making it impossible to afford the plans.The fact is a person should not have to depend on employers for health insurance.With this mean mandate there won&#8217;t be anyone left in the State of Massachusetts.The lawmakers need to make laws against them ripping us off.Thats what needs to be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celia Wcislo</title>
		<link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/wbur-posts-and-stories/2007/11/are-employers-doing-their-fair-share/comment-page-1/#comment-5179</link>
		<dc:creator>Celia Wcislo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/weblogs/commonhealth/?p=275#comment-5179</guid>
		<description>Many businesses in MA filed their employer health insurance information today.  The businesses who filed were either too small to have to provide insurance, or they already were providing it.  Just over 1% of those who filed on time will have to pay the Fair Share assessment.
 
So are there really only 513 MA companies who don&#039;t provide insurance?  I don&#039;t think so!  16,000 failed to file.  While the state is preparing to enforce the individual mandate, it would be appropriate for them to pursue those employers who failed to file on time, and who don&#039;t contribute to insuring their workers.  They should be the first ones to pay a penalty for ignoring the health reform law since they were the first to miss a deadline.  The Patrick administration has taken a large step in keeping health reform moving by announcing these numbers today.
 
If it turns out that there are few businesses who need to pay their Fair Share, that is good news for MA workers!  But it will also mean the legislature must find other sources of money to make up for the millions of dollars they projected would come from the business Fair Share assessment to fund reform and the Safety Net Trust Fund.
 
We are discovering that there are more uninsured than some surveys projected two years ago.  We need every employer to provid insurance, or pay their fair share to help cover the cost of the uninsured.  The legislation was built on a three-legged stool of responsibility: government, business, and individual.  
 
Let&#039;s make sure that business contributes its fair share so that the stool doesn&#039;t begin to wobble!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many businesses in MA filed their employer health insurance information today.  The businesses who filed were either too small to have to provide insurance, or they already were providing it.  Just over 1% of those who filed on time will have to pay the Fair Share assessment.</p>
<p>So are there really only 513 MA companies who don&#8217;t provide insurance?  I don&#8217;t think so!  16,000 failed to file.  While the state is preparing to enforce the individual mandate, it would be appropriate for them to pursue those employers who failed to file on time, and who don&#8217;t contribute to insuring their workers.  They should be the first ones to pay a penalty for ignoring the health reform law since they were the first to miss a deadline.  The Patrick administration has taken a large step in keeping health reform moving by announcing these numbers today.</p>
<p>If it turns out that there are few businesses who need to pay their Fair Share, that is good news for MA workers!  But it will also mean the legislature must find other sources of money to make up for the millions of dollars they projected would come from the business Fair Share assessment to fund reform and the Safety Net Trust Fund.</p>
<p>We are discovering that there are more uninsured than some surveys projected two years ago.  We need every employer to provid insurance, or pay their fair share to help cover the cost of the uninsured.  The legislation was built on a three-legged stool of responsibility: government, business, and individual.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s make sure that business contributes its fair share so that the stool doesn&#8217;t begin to wobble!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
