I'll Have What She's Having: ‘No-Cost’ Women’s Health Services Start Today

By Dr. Paula Johnson
Guest Contributor

August 1, 2012 marks the first time in history that insurers will be required to provide women with a set of core women’s health preventive services without cost-sharing. These services are part of the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) robust plan of preventive care for women across the lifespan and represent a paradigm shift from a health care system built on diagnostic treatment of disease toward a foundation of disease prevention and wellness promotion.

Dr. Paula Johnson, Chief of the DIvision of Women’s Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital

Unfortunately, not all U.S. women will benefit from the new system of care. With June’s Supreme Court ruling, some states may refuse to expand Medicaid to millions of our country’s poorest women, many of whom are near elderly, depriving them of access to preventive services available to Medicaid recipients and a better chance at a healthy life.

Let’s be clear that the preventive health services available under the ACA will allow women to become healthier and help reduce cost. Prior to reform, more than half of U.S. women were not up-to-date on recommended preventive health services, a fact not surprising given the growing epidemic of chronic illness among women that is costly, at an estimated $466 billion per year, yet preventable.

The new preventive services available to women with private insurance include:

Well-woman visits: Half of women delay or avoid well-woman preventive services due to cost barriers.

Screening for gestational diabetes: Gestational diabetes affects 1 in 20 pregnant women with 18% higher associated health care costs.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing: HPV, associated with many conditions including cervical cancer, infects one in four U.S. females with direct costs of $3.6 billion annually.

Counseling for sexually transmitted infections: Nineteen million new occurrences of STIs emerge each year at an estimated annual cost of $17 billion.

Annual counseling and screening for HIV for all sexually active women: Women represent one in four HIV cases#. Lifetime direct medical costs are about $1 billion or between $73 million and $93 million annually.

Contraceptive methods and counseling for all women with reproductive capacity: Nearly half of U.S. pregnancies are unplanned resulting in three million pregnancies each year and a cost of $19 billion annually.

Breastfeeding support, supplies, and counseling: Breastfeeding helps reduce Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, chronic childhood conditions and lowers the risk of breast and ovarian cancers in mothers. If 80 percent of mothers breastfed their children exclusively for the first six months of life, the U.S could save 741 lives and $10.5 billion annually.

Screening and counseling for interpersonal and domestic violence (IPV): One in three women will report IPV in their lifetime. Millions of women in the U.S. are abused by their partners each year at a cost of over $5 billion annually.

The Supreme Court recently ruled that states can decide whether to expand Medicaid coverage to the poorest Americans. In states refusing to expand coverage, many women will be denied access to care, including preventive care. Given that the uninsured are less likely to obtain preventive services, expanding Medicaid offers an avenue for women to receive preventive care, crucial to stemming the rising tide of chronic disease among this population. Furthermore, the resultant increase in preventive service utilization that insurance is likely to bring can lower chronic illness rates and the associated health care costs that often contribute to growing government budgets.

And for Massachusetts women in particular:

Massachusetts has a long history of requiring private insurers to cover a list of comprehensive medical and preventive services for its residents. Many of these mandates existed prior to Massachusetts reform (Chapter 58) and were incorporated into the 2006 state health reform law. The ACA enhances Massachusetts’ existing benefits in two important ways. First, the federal law eliminates consumer cost-sharing for some of Massachusetts’ mandatory women’s health benefits like contraception and pap smears. Commonwealth Care has voluntarily covered contraception without cost-sharing since Summer of 2011, and now most employer-sponsored plans and Commonwealth Choice Plans will follow suit. Second, the ACA provides Massachusetts women with additional mandatory benefits, including well woman visits, breastfeeding support, gestational diabetes screening and screening for interpersonal violence. Overall, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services estimates that 1,212,350 women in Massachusetts will have guaranteed access to these additional preventive services without cost-sharing for policies renewing on or after August 1, 2012. While Massachusetts women continue to gain access to preventive care under health reform, many women in other states may not be as fortunate.

America, one of the world’s wealthiest countries, spends more per capita on health care than any other nation yet has one of the lowest life expectancy rates in the developed world. To improve quality and reduce cost, all roads lead to prevention. Today marks another step in the right direction. States can do their part by accepting federal Medicaid expansion funding extending prevention and wellness to all women, regardless of income or state of residence.

Paula Johnson, MD, MPH was a member of the IOM Committee on Women’s Health Preventive Services. She is the Executive Director of the Connors Center for Women’s Health and Gender Biology and Chief of the Division of Women’s Health at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

  • Euphrasiasji

    So I, as a Catholic, have now to pay for your abortion causing morning after pill, morals be damned. Because it’s election year, and anti Catholicism is part of Obama’s “war on religion”…

    • guest

      Plan B doesn’t cause an abortion.

  • Henry Sinclair

    Check your policy, some insurance company’s are find ways to skirt federal law: Check you insurance policy- some Health Insurance companies are looking for ways to skirt federal law: http://selecthealthinsurancescam.blogspot.com/

  • Mimi

    I nearly laughed out loud when I see someone start whining about meds for “ED” when they think women are getting what they need to stay healthy.    Just can’t help but wonder if ED is life threatening.  Having an unwanted pregnancy is not the same, guys.  Not the same at all.
    Women die in childbirth, too.  Oh, well.  Why talk to a brick wall.

  • Ptaddonio

    Thanks for sharing this thoughtful piece from Dr. Johnson. We’ve blogged about it here:
    schweitzerfellowship.wordpress.com/2012/08/01/womens-health-as-an-economic-imperative-lessons-on-framing-the-issues-you-care-about/

  • Reasonable?

    People need to get to work….men and women…should we provide free cars or transportation passes?  The logic of health care in the US is clearly different from how we think about other services…..Why not expect that people pay for services and lower cost through competition.

    We didn’t need all these regulations for almost everyone these days to have a cell phone……I think we’d sucessfully overthought health care.  Now we will try to get more people more coverage at lower cost without using market forces…..seem like magical thinking to me.

  • John MD

    It costs quite a bit of money to delay illnesses and ultimately death isn’t preventable.  There aren’t enough people in the “pipeline” to sustain a tax base for future health care without rapidly bankrupting the nation.  Economic growth is stagnant.  Entitlements to all classes need to stop growing and need to be gradually reduced.  We need to stop looking at the Government as a cow to be milked and ask “what we can do for our country?”, not “what can our country do for us?”.  The country is at a tipping point and coming closer and closer to financial chaos and ultimately complete destruction.  It scares me.

    • 323lois43

      Do YOU have a good job with good benefits? Did you find it within yourself to also bitch about the WAR that has bankrupted this country many times over?

      • Joemash

         Of course NOT, John!  Bring back the Draft and see how THAT changes, ‘put your dog into the fight’ so to speak.

  • Guest321654987

    Really, ED? This is preventative care, NOT for sexual reasons.

    • Nunu Ya Bizz

      Sure then you wouldn’t mind denying these services to people who smoke, right?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_V5U7IBL7KAUR6YBD7WPZQYVKGM Rob

    Are you so sure it’s a “benefit” to put poison in your body?

  • Cspacer

    who is going to pay for these “free” preventitive services???

  • Throckmartin

    Oh yeah, since when is something that costs at $6,000 – $8,000 per year FREE?

  • Throckmartin

    My question is when do we get equlity in health insurance coverage, for MEN. It is all good and well that women get special perks, but men’s health issues should also be covered. ED for example.

    • Uteruscardholder

      Maybe you will receive Equality…when you can learn to spell it correctly…EQUALITY

    • Nunu Ya Bizz

      Medicare already provides some free Viagra/Levitra/Cialis under most Part-D plans. You’ve had it for years.

      As much as I’m for bringing men back to equal in the rest of society, this issue is one you can’t argue.

      Now if we can just be paid what men are worth, instead of a womans wage in this country, we’ll be fine. Woman have their equal pay at the expense of mens wages falling and inflation. Why should men be paid only for what a woman can accomplish? I never see women on the back of the garbage truck, nor do I see them on a roof in July laying shingles…